<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Future-of-Work on Anatoly&#39;s Blog</title>
    <link>https://anatoly.dev/tags/future-of-work/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Future-of-Work on Anatoly&#39;s Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.152.2</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://anatoly.dev/tags/future-of-work/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI Won&#39;t Replace Programmers—At Least Not Anytime Soon</title>
      <link>https://anatoly.dev/posts/2025/08/ai-wont-replace-programmers/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://anatoly.dev/posts/2025/08/ai-wont-replace-programmers/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I may not be the smartest person in the room, but after working closely with Claude and ChatGPT over the past few months, I want to share some observations. AI won&amp;rsquo;t replace programmers—at least not anytime soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For AI to truly replace programmers, one of two conditions must be met:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Accept that our codebases will eventually become completely unreadable to humans. Once no human can maintain the code, all bugs must be fixed by AI. Inevitably, the AI will encounter a bug it can&amp;rsquo;t solve, and we&amp;rsquo;ll need human programmers to refactor and essentially rewrite everything from scratch.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
